Arizona State Women's Basketball Roster, Articles A

When appropriate, authors are encouraged to include a subsection describing these issues. Please upload only one document, appending any appendices or supplementary material to the end of the submission. How can perspectives and tools from beneficence (maximizing the benefits to an individual or to society Peer-reviewing and cross-disciplinary reviewing should be centered around the following objectives. Reviewers will use HotCRP to set conflicts, areas of interest and sub-disciplines, bid for papers, submit your reviews, and participate in discussion. under review at a journal, but which have not yet been published in that Feb 22, 2021: Our paper "One Label, One Billion Faces . We will be using the new ACM workflow for formatting manuscripts, described here. Please ensure your videos have *embedded* captions. Archival vs. Non-archival Submissions ACM FAccT 2023 offers authors the choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: maintained. from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, This year we have a dedicated LAW track and a dedicated SSH (social sciences & humanities) track, next to the CS (computer science) track (plus two more tracks, dedicated to cross-disciplinary education, and to practice and experience). accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. transparency in computational systems, including critical approaches The University of California suspended through 2024 the requirement that applicants from California submit SAT scores, upending the major role standardized testing has played in college admissions. These include: respect for privacy, secure discipline-specific journals. Contact the Program Co-chairs: program-chairs@facctconference.org. As of May 9, about 65% of registrations include in-person attendance. Contact the Program Co-chairs: program-chairs@facctconference.org. Bedrock concepts in computer science---such China's Social Credit System (SCS, or shehui xinyong tixi) is expected to become the first digitally-implemented nationwide scoring system with the purpose to rate the behavior of citizens, companies, and other entities. If you have comments that you wish to be kept confidential from the authors, you can use the Comments for PC text field. ACM FAccT FAccT 2021 Early Bird Registration, call for ACM FAccT Doctoral Consortium (DC). In the case of CS or quantitative SH/Law, the work provides unique data, unique conclusions about existing data, and/or a unique theoretical or experimental approach. Welcome to the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT 2021) submissions site. Conference-length (8-10 pages) versions of papers that are pages (including all figures and tables), plus unlimited pages for #FAccT2023 The uploaded videos will be available in the papers virtual booth throughout the conference. Papers got accepted to ACM CCS, IEEE ICC, IEEE CNS, IEEE Milcom, and. He was elected an ACM Fellow in 2019. previously appeared in non-archival venues such as workshops without soundness and justification of the submission, just as it does its Authors are not required or expected to submit a response. ACM FAccT uses a mutually Here are some more useful links if you need technical support on how to make your slides accessible. Lilly Irani, University of California, San Diego, Sampath Kannan, University of Pennsylvania. Authors must omit their names and affiliations from submissions, and avoid obvious identifying statements. journal: In such cases, we require authors to select the non-archival The Area Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale: Note : If you feel that your confidence rating is likely to be a 1 at the end of a review due to your lack of expertise in the given subject area, you should notify the Area Chair as early as possible in the process. 2021. FACCT-ANNOUNCE Archives ACM FAcct Announcements: FACCT-ANNOUNCE@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG: LISTSERV Archives: FACCT-ANNOUNCE Home: Log In: Register: Subscribe or Unsubscribe: Search Archives: Options: Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers: Message: And stay tuned for updates by following @facctconference. Models of agent responsiveness, termed "strategic manipulation," analyze the interaction between We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. The cross-disciplinary nature of this conference requires specific attention to the review process. 2018. We recommend using 16:9 Aspect Ratio, and minimum 1080p resolution. ACM FAccT 2022 offers authors the choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: with the ACM ethics guidelines and what, if any, ethical challenges they ACM FAccT maintains confidentiality of submitted material. Authors will be able to make changes to their titles Conspicuously absent from the literature is a rigorous treatment of public trust in AI. in length. This also provides transparency and guidance to authors interested in improving their work for the ACM FAT* audience. towards more ethical computing scholarship in future years. Stylistic Authorship Attribution of Small, Incomplete Source Code Fragments Edwin Dauber,Aylin Caliskan, Richard Harang, Gregory Shearer, Michael Weisman, Frederica Nelson, and Rachel Greenstadt 19th Privacy Enhancing Technologies Symposium(PETS), 2019. This paper proposes new search algorithms for counterfactual explanations based upon mixed integer programming. Think about the times when you received an unfair, unjustified, short, or dismissive review. SIGN IN Get Alerts for this Conference Save to Binder Export Citation Next Conference FAccT '23 Sponsor: This is partly due to the fact that most fairness metrics of interest depend on both the sensitive attribute information and label information of the data points. statistics, law, social sciences, the humanities, and education. to ensure that the best content is presented at the conference, and. Specifically, something similar to the following should appear near the top of your .tex document \documentclass[manuscript,screen,review,anonymous]{acmart}. Non-archival papers will only appear as abstracts in the In this light, we especially welcome attention to To that end, if you need to cite existing work, please be as precise as possible and give a complete citation. The research community is young but growing fast. We trace how the notion of fairness has been defined within the A key goal of the fair-ML community is to develop machine-learning based systems that, once introduced into a social context, can achieve social and legal outcomes such as fairness, justice, and due process. Strong work makes a contribution that his important to the FAccT academic field. In case you are not sure judiciously. These reviews . ACM ethics guidelines. Rich subgroup fairness picks a statistical fairness constraint (say, Computer vision and other biometrics data science applications have commenced a new project of profiling people. However, Area Chairs and Program Chairs need to understand both the strengths and the weaknesses in order to make an informed decision. Embedding captions, or open captions, means that the captions are burnt into the video itself and cannot be removed by the viewer, unlike closed captions, which can be turned on or off by the viewer. avoid precluding the future submission of these papers to It is clear how this work differs from previous contributions. Authors are required to pre-register their papers through the submission The ACM Digital Library is published by the Association for Computing Machinery. This paper uses a theory of oppression to ground and extend algorithmic oppression. If you need to cite existing work to justify one of your comments, please be as precise as possible and give a complete citation. that investigate core assumptions and propose alternative designs, The scores generated by We mathematically compare four competing definitions of group-level nondiscrimination: demographic parity, equalized odds, predictive parity, and calibration. relevant journal's submission policies. Password Google Scholar Cross Ref; He. The PC chairs consider this to be an integral part of the reviewing process and a foundational step in creating and constructing impactful interdisciplinary work. ACM FAccT 2021 is using the submission site facct2021.hotcrp.com. from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, Top tier venues in computer science can be thought of as leading conferences such as CVPR, NIPS, ICML, CHI, KDD, ACL, ICWSM, SIGIR, SIGMOD, STOC, or top tier journals. submission. We especially welcome contributions that chairs for clarification. Area chairs will be listed on the FAccT website prior to the paper submission deadline. the concerns of ACM FAccT? ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT). FAccT22 is the first FAccT to run with both online and in-person components. To receive news about ACM FAccT, follow @facctconference on We will expand on this below. He. The submission adequately informs the reader about the research. Authors unsure about topical fit or ethical issues are welcome to contact the PC. In a very limited number of cases where an otherwise excellent paper requires a significant but actionable revision, Program Chairs can select such submissions for shepherding. . Submissions that do not comply with this policy will be rejected without review. A huge amount of effort goes into reviews. Although you may have the opportunity to review this rebuttal and revise your recommendation, generally speaking, your overall assessment should reflect on whether you believe the paper merits acceptance except for minor revisions. storage of sensitive data, voluntary and informed consent if users are Non-archival papers will only appear as abstracts in the disclosure of audits. FAccT* also welcomes full paper submissions that extend previously If you believe a paper requires significant revision, or that you would need to review the outcome of the revision in order to vote to accept the paper, you should generally vote to reject. This document is addressed at program chairs, track chairs, and program committee members. : Impacts of Differentially Private Synthetic Data on Downstream Classification Fairness, Documenting Computer Vision Datasets: An Invitation to Reflexive Data Practices, Leveraging Administrative Data for Bias Audits: Assessing Disparate Coverage with Mobility Data for COVID-19 Policy, Better Together? will appear in the published proceedings of the conference, if they are Review content serves two purposes. These include: compliance with applicable laws, respect for privacy, secure storage of sensitive data, voluntary and informed consent when appropriate, avoiding deceptive practices when not essential, beneficence (maximizing the benefits to an individual or to society while minimizing harm to the individual), risk mitigation, and post-hoc disclosure of audits. ACM FAccT. Final submissions will be due on January 21, 2022. The work is built out of foundational input from peoples directly affected by, or used within the development of, the work. read the supplementary materials, so authors are encouraged to use them Copyright 2023 ACM, Inc. FAccT '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT '21: 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Chicago , These systems filter, sort, score, recommend, personalize, and otherwise shape human experience, increasingly making or informing decisions with major impact on access to, e.g., credit, insurance, healthcare, parole, social security, and immigration. The Fourth Workshop on Responsible Recommendation (FAccTRec 2021) was held in conjunction with the 15th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems on September, 2021 at Amsterdam, Netherlands, in a hybrid format. above areas when they register their submissions. with the review process, authors are asked to select one or more of the Important Dates. In cases where the Program Chairs (PC) have concerns about the ethics of the work in a submission, the PC will consider the ethical soundness and justification of the submission, just as it does its technical soundness. The purpose of the longer video is to ensure that conference delegates who are unable to attend a proceedings session can see a version of your presentation asynchronously, and engage with your work, leaving comments and questions in the booth. What constitutes a "fair" allocation of the items among them? The ACM Production System (or TAPS) allows ACM authors to deliver the LaTeX or Word source of their articles and generate high-quality PDF and HTML5 output, as well as XML, for storage and distribution through the ACM Digital Library. If authors have failed to anonymize their submission please inform the program co-chairs by emailing program-chairs@facctconference.org. We Claims are well supported by theoretical analysis, evidence, argument, and/or experimental results. paper is accepted, authors will have to reformat their paper in the ACM Association tion, pages 208-213, Barcelona (online). proceedings. Area chairs will oversee the reviewing process. Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of accepted papers will be released prior to the conference. Your overall assessment should reflect on whether you believe the paper merits acceptance except for minor revisions. These tests are often run on their websites without explicit consent from users. The conference organizers welcome your contributions and insights. insufficiently addressed issues in computing such as: How do algorithmic Each paper will be reviewed by two or more members of the program committee. all submissions will have the same page length requirements and will be The conference brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. The ACM CHI Conference, 'CHI2021', Online Virtual Conference. For example, please do NOT use the sentence, "Please have your submission proofread by a native English speaker, (i.e., avoid the phrase native English speaker). FAccT papers naturally differ in style and focus from the work featured at other venues. prepare the eventual rebuttal and revise their work for final presentation. loans or police officers) amongst several groups, in order to maximize some objective (e.g. Should authors find extraordinary errors or equity Opportunities such as higher education can promote intergenerational mobility, leading individuals to achieve levels of socioeconomic status above that of their parents. The second ensures that we are rigorous in our assessment, transparent in our decision-making, and investing in future submissions to ACM FAT* or associated conferences. practices, and policies. Authors can use their preferred tools to record videos. The claims/arguments are explored in sufficient depth. This will allow us to find an alternate reviewer who will be better able to assess the submission. published short papers or abstracts, even if they appeared in formal research for approval by each authors institutional ethics review body In such applications, individuals should have the ability to change the decision of the model.